Abstract
Objective
To compare sensitivity of pathology on imaging between referrals from primary care, physiotherapists, spinal surgeons and other secondary care providers.
Design and setting
A retrospective review of 200 consecutive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients’ first presentations to radiology for MR lumbar scanning at a tertiary orthopaedic centre. A scan report was defined as positive if there was any evidence of neural compromise. Fisher's exact 2 × 2 contingency analyses were performed.
Results
Eighty-seven (44%) scans were positive and 113 (57%) were negative. Forty-four percent of scans requested by general practitioners (GPs) were reported as positive compared with 57% of scans requested by physiotherapists. Only 40% and 20% of scans requested by specialist spinal surgeons and non-spinal team secondary care providers were positive, respectively. Physiotherapist referrals for MRI lumbar spine scans were significantly more likely to be positive compared with GPs (P = 0.05), spinal surgeons (P = 0.03) and others (P = 0.004).
Conclusion
When appropriate, referrals via the extended physiotherapy service should be encouraged, rather than referrals directly from GPs. With appropriate training and in the appropriate clinical context, extended physiotherapy services could include inpatients and could accept outpatient referrals from other secondary care providers and not just from GPs; this would improve efficiency and reduce the workload of the radiology department and the spinal surgical unit.
Citation
Comparison of referrals for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging from physiotherapists, primary care and secondary care: how should referral pathways be optimised?